netdev - Kernel panic nf_nat_setup

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <118081298480841@web25.yandex.ru>
Date:	Wed, 23 Feb 2011 20:07:21 +0300
From:	"\"Oleg A. Arkhangelsky\"" <sysoleg@...dex.ru>
To:	netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Kernel panic nf_nat_setup_info+0x5b3/0x6e0

Hello,

Got this panic yesterday:
http://www.progtech.ru/~oleg/crash.txt

The offending instruction is:
cmpb 54(%edx), %cl # <variable>.tuple.dst.protonum,

and here is the assembler code of net/ipv4/netfilter/nf_nat_core.c:
http://www.progtech.ru/~oleg/nf_nat_core.s

Quick investigation lead me to conclusion that the problem is in
return of same_src function:

        return (t->dst.protonum == tuple->dst.protonum &&
                t->src.u3.ip == tuple->src.u3.ip &&
                t->src.u.all == tuple->src.u.all);

So either t or tuple pointer is bad, but I don't understand how
this can be.

Looks like the similar situation described here:
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21512

Any thoughts on this?
Thank you!

-- 
wbr, Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html