[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110223093001.28e1a8ef@nehalam>
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2011 09:30:01 -0800
From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Juliusz Chroboczek <Juliusz.Chroboczek@....jussieu.fr>,
"John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net_sched: long word align struct qdisc_skb_cb data
On Wed, 23 Feb 2011 18:05:07 +0100
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> wrote:
> Le mercredi 23 février 2011 à 17:24 +0100, Patrick McHardy a écrit :
> > Am 23.02.2011 16:14, schrieb Eric Dumazet:
> > > diff --git a/include/net/sch_generic.h b/include/net/sch_generic.h
> > > index 16626a0..f40d32e 100644
> > > --- a/include/net/sch_generic.h
> > > +++ b/include/net/sch_generic.h
> > > @@ -218,6 +218,7 @@ struct tcf_proto {
> > >
> > > struct qdisc_skb_cb {
> > > unsigned int pkt_len;
> > > + unsigned int sfb_classid;
> > > char data[];
> > > };
> >
> > This could be moved into a SFB specific cb, similar to what netem
> > does.
>
> Hmm... well... I want to be sure no other sch will destroy my values.
>
> netem seems buggy then.
>
> Probably following patch is needed ?
Yes, it was long word aligned when netem was written but
we seem to have bit creep.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists