[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110225225832.GD9763@canuck.infradead.org>
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2011 17:58:32 -0500
From: Thomas Graf <tgraf@...radead.org>
To: Tom Herbert <therbert@...gle.com>
Cc: Bill Sommerfeld <wsommerfeld@...gle.com>,
Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: SO_REUSEPORT - can it be done in kernel?
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 11:51:13AM -0800, Tom Herbert wrote:
> On the UDP side, I believe the patch is functional, but as Eric
> pointed out it probably could be further optimized. I'll split out
> the UDP bits into a separate patch and post that...
Cool! I will be happy to assist in improving it further.
We already see 97-99% CPU utizliation spread evenly over all cores
(with about 20-30% spent in softirq) so at least it already scales
perfectly well.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists