| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20110226024848.GA20993@gondor.apana.org.au> Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2011 10:48:48 +0800 From: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au> To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> Cc: rick.jones2@...com, tgraf@...radead.org, therbert@...gle.com, wsommerfeld@...gle.com, daniel.baluta@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: SO_REUSEPORT - can it be done in kernel? On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 06:12:44PM -0800, David Miller wrote: > > We take the lock unconditionally because we essentially have to after > UDP takes on the socket buffer accounting facilities similar to TCP. Well I just checked out the history tree (2.6.12) and it too had the unconditional lock on the send path. So this predates the system-wide buffer limit change. I'm looking at redoing this and the bulk of the work is going to be restructuring ip_append_data/ip_push_pending_frames so that it doesn't store the states in sk/inet_sk. Cheers, -- Email: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists