[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110227104555.328f5d75@nehalam>
Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2011 10:45:55 -0800
From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: adobriyan@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: net-next: warnings from sysctl_net_exit
On Sat, 26 Feb 2011 22:23:33 -0800 (PST)
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
> From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
> Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2011 16:56:01 -0800
>
> > Seeing lots of these messages in dmesg. Something is broken
> > recently in net-next.
>
> Did you by change pull plain net-2.6 into that tree? Because one
> commit which is in net-2.6 but not in net-next-2.6 catches my eye:
>
> commit c486da34390846b430896a407b47f0cea3a4189c
> Author: Lucian Adrian Grijincu <lucian.grijincu@...il.com>
> Date: Thu Feb 24 19:48:03 2011 +0000
>
> sysctl: ipv6: use correct net in ipv6_sysctl_rtcache_flush
>
> Before this patch issuing these commands:
>
> fd = open("/proc/sys/net/ipv6/route/flush")
> unshare(CLONE_NEWNET)
> write(fd, "stuff")
>
> would flush the newly created net, not the original one.
>
> The equivalent ipv4 code is correct (stores the net inside ->extra1).
> Acked-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...e.fr>
>
> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
>
I am building against pure net-next tree. Just checked by recloning.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists