[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1298975602.3284.13.camel@edumazet-laptop>
Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2011 11:33:22 +0100
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Thomas Graf <tgraf@...radead.org>
Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, rick.jones2@...com,
therbert@...gle.com, wsommerfeld@...gle.com,
daniel.baluta@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: SO_REUSEPORT - can it be done in kernel?
Le mardi 01 mars 2011 à 05:19 -0500, Thomas Graf a écrit :
> On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 06:07:49PM +0100, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > > The numbers differ a lot depending on the architecture we test on.
> > >
> > > F.e. on a 12 core AMD with 2 NUMA nodes:
> > >
> > > 2.6.32 named -n 1: 37.0kqps
> > > named: 3.8kqps (yes, no joke, the socket receive buffer is
> > > always full and the kernel drops pkts)
> >
> > Yes, this old kernel miss commit c377411f2494a93 added in 2.6.35
> > (net: sk_add_backlog() take rmem_alloc into account)
>
> I retested with net-2.6 w/o Herbert's patch:
>
> named -n 1: 36.9kqps
> named: 16.2kqps
Thats better ;)
You could do "cat /proc/net/udp" to check if drops occur on port 53
socket (last column)
But maybe your queryperf is limited to few queries in flight (default is
20 per queryperf instance)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists