[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110302133835.5e267e9e@chukar>
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2011 13:38:35 -0700
From: Jake Edge <jake@....net>
To: Vasiliy Kulikov <segoon@...nwall.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mjt@....msk.ru, arnd@...db.de,
mirqus@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, kuznet@....inr.ac.ru,
pekkas@...core.fi, jmorris@...ei.org, yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org,
kaber@...sh.net, eric.dumazet@...il.com, therbert@...gle.com,
xiaosuo@...il.com, jesse@...ira.com, kees.cook@...onical.com,
eugene@...hat.com, dan.j.rosenberg@...il.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] net: don't allow CAP_NET_ADMIN to load non-netdev
kernel modules
On Wed, 2 Mar 2011 23:18:07 +0300 Vasiliy Kulikov wrote:
> > and on systems that today use CAP_SYS_MODULE
>
> Since Linux 2.6.32 CAP_SYS_MODULE may not load modules via "ifconfig
> gre0". It was changed to CAP_NET_ADMIN. So nothing is broken here.
>
> > (or really the full set of
> > capabilities cuz they are running as root)?
>
> As root has CAP_NET_ADMIN, the alias netdev-gre0 is tried and it
> succeeds.
(I feel like I'm beating a dead horse here, sorry if so ...)
If I have a setuid-root program today that loads ip_gre by using the
alias "gre0", and I run that program on a kernel with this change,
won't it fail because the "gre0" alias is missing? That program
doesn't know to try "netdev-gre0". i.e. won't backward compatibility be
affected by this change?
jake
--
Jake Edge - LWN - jake@....net - http://lwn.net
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists