[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2011 16:25:40 +0100
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Fabio Checconi <fchecconi@...il.com>
Cc: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@....unipi.it>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@...more.it>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: QFQ - quick fair queue scheduler (v2)
Le jeudi 03 mars 2011 à 16:07 +0100, Fabio Checconi a écrit :
> A question on the data below:
>
> > After a stress (and no more trafic) I still have some packets in
> > backlog:
> >
> > (8 packets here)
> >
> ...
> > class qfq 11:10 root weight 1600 maxpkt 2048
> > Sent 200 bytes 1 pkt (dropped 18181, overlimits 0 requeues 0)
> > rate 0bit 0pps backlog 200b 0p requeues 0
>
> Any other reason, apart from a bug in QFQ, why there could be 200b and
> 0p of backlog? A packet count out of sync could explain also why you
> were experiencing problems with pfifo in presence of drops...
My packets are all 200 bytes (from my packet generator)
qfq_dump_class_stats() probably miss one line :
scl->bstats.qlen = cl->qdisc->q.qlen;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists