| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2011 17:52:37 +0100 From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> To: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com> Cc: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, fubar@...ibm.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: bonding... Le jeudi 03 mars 2011 à 08:31 -0800, Stephen Hemminger a écrit : > On Thu, 03 Mar 2011 13:46:31 +0000 > Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com> wrote: > > > On Wed, 2011-03-02 at 21:49 -0800, David Miller wrote: > > [...] > > > This is unacceptable, people are submitting multiple bonding patches > > > every single day now. It needs a clueful bonding person looking at > > > these submissions on a constant basis. > > [...] > > > > And preferably saying 'no' to most new features... > > Agreed. It seems bonding has diverged from the standards and wants > to support every packet flow some user can think up. A simple setup that was working in 2.6.35 doesnt work anymore here vlan.103 - bond0 - eth3 (tg3 nic) With a bnx2 nic, it works Not sure its a bond problem, more probably a vlan one... -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists