[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2011 14:23:57 -0500
From: John Heffner <johnwheffner@...il.com>
To: Li Yu <raise.sail@...il.com>
Cc: netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: A misbehavior of handling TCP out of band data ?
This feature is only here to support legacy applications, and really
should not be used. See RFC 6093. http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6093
-John
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 10:24 AM, Li Yu <raise.sail@...il.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In my words, if we did not turn on SO_OOBINLINE at receiver,
> any OOB bytes do not have to be read from regular TCP byte stream.
>
> But in below extreme case: the sender process have a loop to
> send 1 OOB byte 'O' and 1 byte normal data 'D', the receiver ignore
> all OOB data, so if OOB feature works well, the receiver should
> receive 'D' only, However, in fact, the receiver still can see OOB
> bytes by recv() syscall without MSG_OOB flag.
>
> I found that we may send "ODODODODODOD...." in a tcp segment,
> and tcp_sendmsg() has no special code to avoid this.
>
> Well, I know that it seem that above case is too extreme to
> use in actual environment, but above is simplified from our actual
> scenario.
>
> Anyway, I think that overwriting or skip previous OOB bytes is
> acceptable, but leave them in regular TCP byte stream likely is a bug.
> En, probably, the disabled SO_OOBINLINE just is a feature of receiver
> side, sender do not need to have to guarantee it?
>
> Thanks.
>
> Yu
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists