[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2011 13:54:56 -0800
From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: ja@....bg, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [BUG] VPN broken in net-next
On Thu, 03 Mar 2011 11:23:28 -0800 (PST)
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
> From: Julian Anastasov <ja@....bg>
> Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2011 15:09:22 +0200 (EET)
>
> > On Thu, 3 Mar 2011, Julian Anastasov wrote:
> >
> >> May be the problem is in inet_hash_insert(), it should
> >> hash ifa_local, not ifa_address. May be they are equal for
> >
> > ... and of course the new __ip_dev_find should use
> > ifa_local too.
>
> Thanks for looking into this Julian. I will look at the other
> cases you found later.
>
> Stephen, is this sufficient to fix your problem? I suspect it is
> not because fib_add_addr() adds prefixes with RTN_LOCAL to the
> local routing table too :-/
>
> I suspect that even if we need to handle prefixes, we can still use
> the hash for optimistic lookup, and fallback to a local table FIB
> inspection if that fails.
>
> --------------------
> ipv4: Fix __ip_dev_find() to use ifa_local instead of ifa_address.
>
> Reported-by: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
> Reported-by: Julian Anastasov <ja@....bg>
> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
>
VPN works now with this patch on net-next.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists