netdev - Re: [PATCH 0/3] [RFC] Implement multiqueue (RX & TX) virtio-net

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <OFBDB22C28.E6DB22A2-ON65257849.0043B15C-65257849.0043D8B3@in.ibm.com>
Date:	Fri, 4 Mar 2011 17:52:47 +0530
From:	Krishna Kumar2 <krkumar2@...ibm.com>
To:	habanero@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc:	anthony@...emonkey.ws, arnd@...db.de, avi@...hat.com,
	davem@...emloft.net, eric.dumazet@...il.com, horms@...ge.net.au,
	kvm@...r.kernel.org, mst@...hat.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	rusty@...tcorp.com.au
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] [RFC] Implement multiqueue (RX & TX) virtio-net

Andrew Theurer <habanero@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote on 03/04/2011 12:31:24
AM:

Hi Andrew,

> > _______________________________________________________________________
> >                 TCP: Guest -> Local Host (TCP_STREAM)
> >                  TCP: Local Host -> Guest (TCP_MAERTS)
> >             UDP: Local Host -> Guest (UDP_STREAM)
>
>
> Any reason why the tests don't include a guest-to-guest on same host, or
> on different hosts?  Seems like those would be a lot more common that
> guest-to/from-localhost.

This was missing in my test plan, but good point. I will run
these tests also and send the results soon.

Thanks,

- KK

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html