lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201103041825.48765.florian@openwrt.org>
Date:	Fri, 4 Mar 2011 18:25:48 +0100
From:	Florian Fainelli <florian@...nwrt.org>
To:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Andy Fleming <afleming@...escale.com>
Subject: mii_bus->read return checking in phy_device.c

Hello Andy,

While debugging a PHY probing issue with the au1000_eth, I stumbled upon this 
in drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c:

        phy_reg = bus->read(bus, addr, MII_PHYSID1);                                                  
                                   
        if (phy_reg < 0)                        
                return -EIO;

most drivers implement phylib's mdio_read callback by simply returning the 
contents of their MDIO register after a readl, ioread ... which is unsigned. 
Would not it rather make sense to check for phy_reg <= 0 instead?

This can lead for instance to believing that a PHY is present at a wrong 
address because the MDIO read function returns 0 for that particular register, 
which is logical because no PHY is present at that address.

I am asking in case I just miss something.

Thank you.
--
Florian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ