[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4D724DB4.9020207@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 05 Mar 2011 15:50:28 +0100
From: Nicolas de Pesloüan
<nicolas.2p.debian@...il.com>
To: Jiri Pirko <jpirko@...hat.com>
CC: netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
shemminger@...ux-foundation.org, kaber@...sh.net, fubar@...ibm.com,
eric.dumazet@...il.com, andy@...yhouse.net
Subject: Re: [patch net-next-2.6 6/8] bonding: move processing of recv handlers
into handle_frame()
Le 05/03/2011 15:43, Jiri Pirko a écrit :
> Sat, Mar 05, 2011 at 03:33:30PM CET, nicolas.2p.debian@...il.com wrote:
>> Le 05/03/2011 11:29, Jiri Pirko a écrit :
>>> Since now when bonding uses rx_handler, all traffic going into bond
>>> device goes thru bond_handle_frame. So there's no need to go back into
>>> bonding code later via ptype handlers. This patch converts
>>> original ptype handlers into "bonding receive probes". These functions
>>> are called from bond_handle_frame and they are registered per-mode.
>>
>> Does this still support having the arp_ip_target on a vlan?
>>
>> (eth0 -> bond0 -> bond0.100, with arp_ip_target only reachable through bond0.100).
>
> This case is still covered with vlan_on_bond_hook
> eth0->
> bond_handle_frame
> bond0->
> vlan_hwaccel_do_receive
> bond0.5->
> vlan_on_bond_hook -> reinject into bond0
> -> bond_handle_frame (here it is processed)
Sound good to me.
Reviewed-by: Nicolas de Pesloüan <nicolas.2p.debian@...e.fr>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists