netdev - [PATCH 05/18] IPVS: Add ip_vs_route_me

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1299368760-14271-6-git-send-email-horms@verge.net.au>
Date:	Sun,  6 Mar 2011 08:45:47 +0900
From:	Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>
To:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org,
	netfilter@...r.kernel.org, lvs-devel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Julian Anastasov <ja@....bg>,
	Hans Schillstrom <hans@...illstrom.com>,
	Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>
Subject: [PATCH 05/18] IPVS: Add ip_vs_route_me_harder()

Add ip_vs_route_me_harder() to avoid repeating the same code twice.

Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>
---
 net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c |   48 +++++++++++++++++---------------------
 1 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c
index 6f4940e..299c7f3 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c
@@ -631,6 +631,24 @@ static inline int ip_vs_gather_frags_v6(struct sk_buff *skb, u_int32_t user)
 }
 #endif
 
+static int ip_vs_route_me_harder(int af, struct sk_buff *skb)
+{
+	struct netns_ipvs *ipvs = net_ipvs(skb_net(skb));
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_IP_VS_IPV6
+	if (af == AF_INET6) {
+		if (ipvs->sysctl_snat_reroute && ip6_route_me_harder(skb) != 0)
+			return 1;
+	} else
+#endif
+		if ((ipvs->sysctl_snat_reroute ||
+		     skb_rtable(skb)->rt_flags & RTCF_LOCAL) &&
+		    ip_route_me_harder(skb, RTN_LOCAL) != 0)
+			return 1;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 /*
  * Packet has been made sufficiently writable in caller
  * - inout: 1=in->out, 0=out->in
@@ -737,7 +755,6 @@ static int handle_response_icmp(int af, struct sk_buff *skb,
 				struct ip_vs_protocol *pp,
 				unsigned int offset, unsigned int ihl)
 {
-	struct netns_ipvs *ipvs;
 	unsigned int verdict = NF_DROP;
 
 	if (IP_VS_FWD_METHOD(cp) != 0) {
@@ -759,8 +776,6 @@ static int handle_response_icmp(int af, struct sk_buff *skb,
 	if (!skb_make_writable(skb, offset))
 		goto out;
 
-	ipvs = net_ipvs(skb_net(skb));
-
 #ifdef CONFIG_IP_VS_IPV6
 	if (af == AF_INET6)
 		ip_vs_nat_icmp_v6(skb, pp, cp, 1);
@@ -768,16 +783,8 @@ static int handle_response_icmp(int af, struct sk_buff *skb,
 #endif
 		ip_vs_nat_icmp(skb, pp, cp, 1);
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_IP_VS_IPV6
-	if (af == AF_INET6) {
-		if (ipvs->sysctl_snat_reroute && ip6_route_me_harder(skb) != 0)
-			goto out;
-	} else
-#endif
-		if ((ipvs->sysctl_snat_reroute ||
-		     skb_rtable(skb)->rt_flags & RTCF_LOCAL) &&
-		    ip_route_me_harder(skb, RTN_LOCAL) != 0)
-			goto out;
+	if (ip_vs_route_me_harder(af, skb))
+		goto out;
 
 	/* do the statistics and put it back */
 	ip_vs_out_stats(cp, skb);
@@ -985,7 +992,6 @@ handle_response(int af, struct sk_buff *skb, struct ip_vs_proto_data *pd,
 		struct ip_vs_conn *cp, int ihl)
 {
 	struct ip_vs_protocol *pp = pd->pp;
-	struct netns_ipvs *ipvs;
 
 	IP_VS_DBG_PKT(11, af, pp, skb, 0, "Outgoing packet");
 
@@ -1021,18 +1027,8 @@ handle_response(int af, struct sk_buff *skb, struct ip_vs_proto_data *pd,
 	 * if it came from this machine itself.  So re-compute
 	 * the routing information.
 	 */
-	ipvs = net_ipvs(skb_net(skb));
-
-#ifdef CONFIG_IP_VS_IPV6
-	if (af == AF_INET6) {
-		if (ipvs->sysctl_snat_reroute && ip6_route_me_harder(skb) != 0)
-			goto drop;
-	} else
-#endif
-		if ((ipvs->sysctl_snat_reroute ||
-		     skb_rtable(skb)->rt_flags & RTCF_LOCAL) &&
-		    ip_route_me_harder(skb, RTN_LOCAL) != 0)
-			goto drop;
+	if (ip_vs_route_me_harder(af, skb))
+		goto drop;
 
 	IP_VS_DBG_PKT(10, af, pp, skb, 0, "After SNAT");
 
-- 
1.7.2.3

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html