[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110305093459.GH5071@psychotron.redhat.com>
Date: Sat, 5 Mar 2011 10:35:00 +0100
From: Jiri Pirko <jpirko@...hat.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
shemminger@...ux-foundation.org, kaber@...sh.net, fubar@...ibm.com,
nicolas.2p.debian@...il.com, andy@...yhouse.net
Subject: Re: [patch net-next-2.6 0/8] mostly bonding rx path changes
Sat, Mar 05, 2011 at 10:12:09AM CET, eric.dumazet@...il.com wrote:
>Le samedi 05 mars 2011 à 09:29 +0100, Jiri Pirko a écrit :
>> This patchset focuses mainly bonding rx path changes.
>>
>> Depends on "fcoe: correct checking for bonding"
>>
>> Jiri Pirko (8):
>> af_packet: use skb->skb_iif instead of orig_dev->ifindex
>> bonding: register slave pointer for rx_handler
>> net: get rid of multiple bond-related netdevice->priv_flags
>> bonding: wrap slave state work
>> bonding: get rid of IFF_SLAVE_INACTIVE netdev->priv_flag
>> bonding: move processing of recv handlers into handle_frame()
>> net: introduce rx_handler results and logic around that
>> net: get rid of orig_dev parameter of packet handlers
>>
>
>Jiri, I do believe your changelogs are not very helpful ...
>
>Oh wait, maybe you forgot to _include_ them ?
Well, I tried to explain that in subject. I think that most of patches
are very local so additional description would be redundant. Truth is
that I could comment "net: introduce rx_handler results and logic around
that" or perhaps "bonding: move processing of recv handlers into
handle_frame()" more.
/me thinks that he needs to learn how to write novels...
Anyway. I can repost with some more text if you like.
>
>;)
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists