netdev - Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 30462] New: High cpu usage when someone sends many ipv6 udp packages

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20110304.172157.48483962.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Fri, 04 Mar 2011 17:21:57 -0800 (PST)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, bugzilla-daemon@...zilla.kernel.org,
	bugme-daemon@...zilla.kernel.org, ernstp@...il.com
Subject: Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 30462] New: High cpu usage when someone sends
 many ipv6 udp packages

From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2011 17:15:06 -0800

>> The following ipv6 related changes were introduced between -rc2 and -rc3 that I
>> can see. The "Revert 'administrative down' address handling changes." looked
>> big...
>>       ipv6: Always clone offlink routes.
>>       ipv6: Revert 'administrative down' address handling changes.

Can we narrow it down to which of those two changes introduced the
regression?

We have another issue, still open, which is caused by the first
change, so maybe try reverting that one first.

Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html