netdev - Lacking to initialize "IP6CB(skb)->nhoff" for ipv6 transmission ?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <AANLkTik2JGLJaYiF0uzM8TvQ44GR=OrdJ2mvz-53nS_6@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Sat, 5 Mar 2011 00:59:25 -0300
From:	Eduardo Panisset <eduardo.panisset@...il.com>
To:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Lacking to initialize "IP6CB(skb)->nhoff" for ipv6 transmission ?

Hi,

Im using iptables for marking outgoing packets and then divert them to
specific routing tables.
Whenever a flow matches a rule into mangle table it is marked properly
and reaches over the function ip6_route_me_harder.
That function ends up calling xfrm_decode_session and in particular
_decode_session6 for v6 flows.
The latter uses "IP6CB(skb)->nhoff" for locating nextheader value but
on my debugs it was presenting a weird value (96) instead of the
expected (6), since it was a TCP flow.
So I made the decision of initializing "IP6CB(skb)->nhoff" (with the
value offset(struct ipv6hdr, nexthdr) ) in "ip6_xmit" function and
then the (6) started to be shown and the (96) value did not appeared
anymore.
Is this proceeding correct ? (and then that would be a kernel bug ?)

Rgds,
Eduardo Panisset.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html