[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1299329330.4277.97.camel@localhost>
Date: Sat, 05 Mar 2011 12:48:50 +0000
From: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
To: Jiri Pirko <jpirko@...hat.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
shemminger@...ux-foundation.org, kaber@...sh.net, fubar@...ibm.com,
eric.dumazet@...il.com, nicolas.2p.debian@...il.com,
andy@...yhouse.net
Subject: Re: [patch net-next-2.6 7/8] net: introduce rx_handler results and
logic around that
On Sat, 2011-03-05 at 11:29 +0100, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> This patch allows rx_handlers to better signalize what to do next to
> it's caller. That makes skb->deliver_no_wcard no longer needed.
[...]
> --- a/include/linux/netdevice.h
> +++ b/include/linux/netdevice.h
> @@ -390,7 +390,14 @@ enum gro_result {
> };
> typedef enum gro_result gro_result_t;
>
> -typedef struct sk_buff *rx_handler_func_t(struct sk_buff *skb);
> +enum rx_handler_result {
> + RX_HANDLER_CONSUMED,
> + RX_HANDLER_ANOTHER,
> + RX_HANDLER_EXACT,
> + RX_HANDLER_PASS,
> +};
[...]
This should have a comment (preferably kernel-doc) clearly specifying
the meaning of each code, as the differences between ANOTHER/EXACT/PASS
are fairly subtle.
Ben,
--
Ben Hutchings, Senior Software Engineer, Solarflare Communications
Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job.
They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists