[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4D724382.7010705@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 05 Mar 2011 15:06:58 +0100
From: Nicolas de Pesloüan
<nicolas.2p.debian@...il.com>
To: Jiri Pirko <jpirko@...hat.com>
CC: netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
shemminger@...ux-foundation.org, kaber@...sh.net, fubar@...ibm.com,
eric.dumazet@...il.com, andy@...yhouse.net
Subject: Re: [patch net-next-2.6 2/8] bonding: register slave pointer for
rx_handler
Le 05/03/2011 11:29, Jiri Pirko a écrit :
> Register slave pointer as rx_handler data. That would eventually prevent
> need to loop over slave devices to find the right slave.
>
> Use synchronize_net to ensure that bond_handle_frame does not get slave
> structure freed when working with that.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko<jpirko@...hat.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c | 17 +++++++++++------
> drivers/net/bonding/bonding.h | 3 +++
> 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
> index 0592e6d..1c19368 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
> @@ -1495,21 +1495,22 @@ static bool bond_should_deliver_exact_match(struct sk_buff *skb,
>
> static struct sk_buff *bond_handle_frame(struct sk_buff *skb)
> {
> - struct net_device *slave_dev;
> + struct slave *slave;
> struct net_device *bond_dev;
>
> skb = skb_share_check(skb, GFP_ATOMIC);
> if (unlikely(!skb))
> return NULL;
> - slave_dev = skb->dev;
> - bond_dev = ACCESS_ONCE(slave_dev->master);
> +
> + slave = bond_slave_get_rcu(skb->dev);
> + bond_dev = ACCESS_ONCE(slave->dev->master);
> if (unlikely(!bond_dev))
> return skb;
>
> if (bond_dev->priv_flags& IFF_MASTER_ARPMON)
> - slave_dev->last_rx = jiffies;
> + slave->dev->last_rx = jiffies;
>
> - if (bond_should_deliver_exact_match(skb, slave_dev, bond_dev)) {
> + if (bond_should_deliver_exact_match(skb, slave->dev, bond_dev)) {
> skb->deliver_no_wcard = 1;
> return skb;
> }
Up to this point, it looks like cleanup, and unrelated to the title and description of the patch.
Anyway, the cleanup looks good to me. Should just be in a separate patch.
> @@ -1703,7 +1704,8 @@ int bond_enslave(struct net_device *bond_dev, struct net_device *slave_dev)
> pr_debug("Error %d calling netdev_set_bond_master\n", res);
> goto err_restore_mac;
> }
> - res = netdev_rx_handler_register(slave_dev, bond_handle_frame, NULL);
> + res = netdev_rx_handler_register(slave_dev, bond_handle_frame,
> + new_slave);
And using rx_handler data for this purpose sounds good to me.
Reviewed-by: Nicolas de Pesloüan <nicolas.2p.debian@...e.fr>
> if (res) {
> pr_debug("Error %d calling netdev_rx_handler_register\n", res);
> goto err_unset_master;
> @@ -1925,6 +1927,7 @@ err_close:
>
> err_unreg_rxhandler:
> netdev_rx_handler_unregister(slave_dev);
> + synchronize_net();
>
> err_unset_master:
> netdev_set_bond_master(slave_dev, NULL);
> @@ -2108,6 +2111,7 @@ int bond_release(struct net_device *bond_dev, struct net_device *slave_dev)
> }
>
> netdev_rx_handler_unregister(slave_dev);
> + synchronize_net();
> netdev_set_bond_master(slave_dev, NULL);
>
> slave_disable_netpoll(slave);
> @@ -2222,6 +2226,7 @@ static int bond_release_all(struct net_device *bond_dev)
> }
>
> netdev_rx_handler_unregister(slave_dev);
> + synchronize_net();
> netdev_set_bond_master(slave_dev, NULL);
>
> slave_disable_netpoll(slave);
> diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bonding.h b/drivers/net/bonding/bonding.h
> index ff4e269..1aac5cd 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/bonding/bonding.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bonding.h
> @@ -264,6 +264,9 @@ struct bonding {
> #endif /* CONFIG_DEBUG_FS */
> };
>
> +#define bond_slave_get_rcu(dev) \
> + ((struct slave *) rcu_dereference(dev->rx_handler_data))
> +
> /**
> * Returns NULL if the net_device does not belong to any of the bond's slaves
> *
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists