| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <4D744FB0.1010102@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2011 11:23:28 +0800
From: Weiping Pan <panweiping3@...il.com>
To: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@...ibm.com>
CC: netdev@...r.kernel.org, bonding-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
Linda Wang <lwang@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: bonding can't change to another slave if you ifdown the active
slave
On 03/05/2011 08:38 AM, Jay Vosburgh wrote:
> Weiping Pan<panweiping3@...il.com> wrote:
>
>> I'm doing some Linux bonding driver test, and I find a problem in
>> balance-rr mode.
>> That's it can't change to another slave if you ifdown the active slave.
>> Any comments are warmly welcomed!
> I followed your recipe on a somewhat more recent kernel (2.6.37)
> and using real hardware, and I don't see the problem you describe.
>
> I do have a couple of questions, further down.
>
> [...]
>> My host is Fedora 14, and I install VirtualBox (4.0.2), and enable 4
> I've not ever tried virtualbox, but it may be that its virtual
> switch is misbehaving. One possibility that comes to mind is that the
> virtual switch is confused by seeing the same MAC address on multiple
> ports (which is a problem with a hardware virtual switch I'm familiar
> with).
I use bridge mode in virtualbox.
[root@...alhost ~]# VBoxManage showvminfo
67b83c47-0ee2-46bc-b0ff-e0eb43edc1c2 |grep ^NIC
NIC 1: MAC: 0800270481A8, Attachment: Bridged Interface
'eth0', Cable connected: on, Trace: off (file: none), Type: 82540EM,
Reported speed: 0 Mbps, Boot priority: 0
NIC 2: MAC: 08002778F641, Attachment: Bridged Interface
'eth0', Cable connected: on, Trace: off (file: none), Type: 82540EM,
Reported speed: 0 Mbps, Boot priority: 0
NIC 3: MAC: 080027C408BA, Attachment: Bridged Interface
'eth0', Cable connected: on, Trace: off (file: none), Type: 82540EM,
Reported speed: 0 Mbps, Boot priority: 0
NIC 4: MAC: 080027DB339A, Attachment: Bridged Interface
'eth0', Cable connected: on, Trace: off (file: none), Type: 82540EM,
Reported speed: 0 Mbps, Boot priority: 0
NIC 5: disabled
NIC 6: disabled
NIC 7: disabled
NIC 8: disabled
>> nics for the guest system.
>> My guest is Fedora 14 too.
>> First on my host, I run:
>> [pwp@...alhost linux-2.6.35-comment]$ uname -a
>> Linux localhost.localdomain 2.6.35.11-83.fc14.i686 #1 SMP Mon Feb 7
>> 07:04:18 UTC 2011 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
>>
>> [pwp@...alhost linux-2.6.35-comment]$ sudo ifconfig eth0:0 192.168.1.100
>> netmask 255.255.255.0 up
>> [pwp@...alhost linux-2.6.35-comment]$ sudo ifconfig
>> eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 64:31:50:3A:B0:B5
>> inet addr:10.66.65.228 Bcast:10.66.65.255 Mask:255.255.254.0
>> inet6 addr: fe80::6631:50ff:fe3a:b0b5/64 Scope:Link
>> UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
>> RX packets:811505 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
>> TX packets:777018 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
>> collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
>> RX bytes:709681583 (676.8 MiB) TX bytes:71520005 (68.2 MiB)
>> Interrupt:17
>>
>> eth0:0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 64:31:50:3A:B0:B5
>> inet addr:192.168.1.100 Bcast:192.168.1.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
>> UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
>> Interrupt:17
>>
>> Then I enable bonding on my guest, I run:
>> [root@...alhost ~]# uname -a
>> Linux localhost.localdomain 2.6.35.11-83.fc14.i686 #1 SMP Mon Feb 7
>> 07:04:18 UTC 2011 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
>>
>> [root@...alhost ~]# ifconfig
>> eth6 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 08:00:27:3A:4D:BD
>> inet addr:10.66.65.167 Bcast:10.66.65.255 Mask:255.255.254.0
>> inet6 addr: fe80::a00:27ff:fe3a:4dbd/64 Scope:Link
>> UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
>> RX packets:65 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
>> TX packets:31 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
>> collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
>> RX bytes:9916 (9.6 KiB) TX bytes:3090 (3.0 KiB)
>>
>> eth7 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 08:00:27:26:1B:DB
>> inet addr:10.66.65.154 Bcast:10.66.65.255 Mask:255.255.254.0
>> inet6 addr: fe80::a00:27ff:fe26:1bdb/64 Scope:Link
>> UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
>> RX packets:57 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
>> TX packets:8 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
>> collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
>> RX bytes:7358 (7.1 KiB) TX bytes:1152 (1.1 KiB)
>>
>> eth8 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 08:00:27:B5:FC:D1
>> inet addr:10.66.65.169 Bcast:10.66.65.255 Mask:255.255.254.0
>> inet6 addr: fe80::a00:27ff:feb5:fcd1/64 Scope:Link
>> UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
>> RX packets:57 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
>> TX packets:8 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
>> collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
>> RX bytes:7358 (7.1 KiB) TX bytes:1152 (1.1 KiB)
>>
>> eth9 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 08:00:27:C7:7B:FC
>> inet addr:10.66.65.216 Bcast:10.66.65.255 Mask:255.255.254.0
>> inet6 addr: fe80::a00:27ff:fec7:7bfc/64 Scope:Link
>> UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
>> RX packets:57 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
>> TX packets:8 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
>> collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
>> RX bytes:7358 (7.1 KiB) TX bytes:1152 (1.1 KiB)
>>
>> lo Link encap:Local Loopback
>> inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0
>> inet6 addr: ::1/128 Scope:Host
>> UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:16436 Metric:1
>> RX packets:123 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
>> TX packets:123 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
>> collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
>> RX bytes:13036 (12.7 KiB) TX bytes:13036 (12.7 KiB)
>>
>> [root@...alhost ~]# ifconfig eth7 down
>> [root@...alhost ~]# ifconfig eth8 down
>> [root@...alhost ~]# dmesg -c
>> [root@...alhost ~]# modprobe bonding mode=0 miimon=100
>> [root@...alhost ~]# ifconfig bond0 192.168.1.5 netmask 255.255.255.0 up
>> [root@...alhost ~]# ifenslave bond0 eth7
>>
>> [root@...alhost ~]# dmesg
>> [ 304.496463] bonding: Ethernet Channel Bonding Driver: v3.6.0
>> (September 26, 2009)
>> [ 304.496468] bonding: MII link monitoring set to 100 ms
>> [ 353.527680] ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): bond0: link is not ready
>> [ 355.321626] e1000: eth7 NIC Link is Up 1000 Mbps Full Duplex, Flow
>> Control: RX
>> [ 355.322250] bonding: bond0: enslaving eth7 as an active interface
>> with an up link.
>> [ 355.323503] ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): bond0: link becomes ready
>> [ 365.394052] bond0: no IPv6 routers present
>>
>> [pwp@...alhost ~]$ ping 192.168.1.100 -c 10
> At this point, what is in the routing table ("ip route show")
> and the ARP table ("ip neigh show")?
[root@...alhost ~]# ip route show
192.168.1.0/24 dev bond0 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.1.5
10.66.64.0/23 dev eth7 proto kernel scope link src 10.66.65.53 metric 1
10.66.64.0/23 dev eth6 proto kernel scope link src 10.66.65.128
metric 1
default via 10.66.65.254 dev eth7 proto static
[root@...alhost ~]# ip neigh show
192.168.1.100 dev bond0 lladdr 64:31:50:3a:b0:b5 REACHABLE
>> PING 192.168.1.100 (192.168.1.100) 56(84) bytes of data.
>> 64 bytes from 192.168.1.100: icmp_req=1 ttl=64 time=0.196 ms
>> 64 bytes from 192.168.1.100: icmp_req=2 ttl=64 time=0.365 ms
>> 64 bytes from 192.168.1.100: icmp_req=3 ttl=64 time=0.259 ms
>> 64 bytes from 192.168.1.100: icmp_req=4 ttl=64 time=0.135 ms
>> 64 bytes from 192.168.1.100: icmp_req=5 ttl=64 time=0.194 ms
>> 64 bytes from 192.168.1.100: icmp_req=6 ttl=64 time=0.225 ms
>> 64 bytes from 192.168.1.100: icmp_req=7 ttl=64 time=0.189 ms
>> 64 bytes from 192.168.1.100: icmp_req=8 ttl=64 time=0.274 ms
>> 64 bytes from 192.168.1.100: icmp_req=9 ttl=64 time=1.07 ms
>> 64 bytes from 192.168.1.100: icmp_req=10 ttl=64 time=0.274 ms
>>
>> --- 192.168.1.100 ping statistics ---
>> 10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 9002ms
>> rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.135/0.319/1.079/0.260 ms
>>
>> [root@...alhost ~]# ifenslave bond0 eth8
>> [root@...alhost ~]# dmesg
>> [ 304.496463] bonding: Ethernet Channel Bonding Driver: v3.6.0
>> (September 26, 2009)
>> [ 304.496468] bonding: MII link monitoring set to 100 ms
>> [ 353.527680] ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): bond0: link is not ready
>> [ 355.321626] e1000: eth7 NIC Link is Up 1000 Mbps Full Duplex, Flow
>> Control: RX
>> [ 355.322250] bonding: bond0: enslaving eth7 as an active interface
>> with an up link.
>> [ 355.323503] ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): bond0: link becomes ready
>> [ 365.394052] bond0: no IPv6 routers present
>> [ 510.913797] e1000: eth8 NIC Link is Up 1000 Mbps Full Duplex, Flow
>> Control: RX
>> [ 510.917312] bonding: bond0: enslaving eth8 as an active interface
>> with an up link.
>>
>> [pwp@...alhost ~]$ ping 192.168.1.100 -c 10
>> PING 192.168.1.100 (192.168.1.100) 56(84) bytes of data.
>> 64 bytes from 192.168.1.100: icmp_req=1 ttl=64 time=0.182 ms
>> 64 bytes from 192.168.1.100: icmp_req=2 ttl=64 time=0.211 ms
>> 64 bytes from 192.168.1.100: icmp_req=3 ttl=64 time=0.270 ms
>> 64 bytes from 192.168.1.100: icmp_req=4 ttl=64 time=0.248 ms
>> 64 bytes from 192.168.1.100: icmp_req=5 ttl=64 time=0.132 ms
>> 64 bytes from 192.168.1.100: icmp_req=6 ttl=64 time=0.291 ms
>> 64 bytes from 192.168.1.100: icmp_req=7 ttl=64 time=0.246 ms
>> 64 bytes from 192.168.1.100: icmp_req=8 ttl=64 time=0.272 ms
>> 64 bytes from 192.168.1.100: icmp_req=9 ttl=64 time=0.293 ms
>> 64 bytes from 192.168.1.100: icmp_req=10 ttl=64 time=0.133 ms
>>
>> --- 192.168.1.100 ping statistics ---
>> 10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 9000ms
>> rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.132/0.227/0.293/0.060 ms
>>
>> [root@...alhost ~]# ifconfig
>> bond0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 08:00:27:26:1B:DB
>> inet addr:192.168.1.5 Bcast:192.168.1.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
>> inet6 addr: fe80::a00:27ff:fe26:1bdb/64 Scope:Link
>> UP BROADCAST RUNNING MASTER MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
>> RX packets:311 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
>> TX packets:61 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
>> collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
>> RX bytes:38075 (37.1 KiB) TX bytes:8698 (8.4 KiB)
>>
>> eth7 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 08:00:27:26:1B:DB
>> inet addr:10.66.65.154 Bcast:10.66.65.255 Mask:255.255.254.0
>> UP BROADCAST RUNNING SLAVE MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
>> RX packets:181 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
>> TX packets:39 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
>> collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
>> RX bytes:22297 (21.7 KiB) TX bytes:4578 (4.4 KiB)
>>
>> eth8 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 08:00:27:26:1B:DB
>> inet addr:192.168.1.15 Bcast:192.168.1.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
>> UP BROADCAST RUNNING SLAVE MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
>> RX packets:130 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
>> TX packets:22 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
>> collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
>> RX bytes:15778 (15.4 KiB) TX bytes:4120 (4.0 KiB)
>>
>> [root@...alhost ~]# ifconfig eth7 down
> Next question: just after setting eth7 down, what do the routing
> and ARP tables look like?
[root@...alhost ~]# ifconfig eth7 down
[root@...alhost ~]# ip route show
192.168.1.0/24 dev bond0 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.1.5
10.66.64.0/23 dev eth6 proto kernel scope link src 10.66.65.128
metric 1
default via 10.66.65.254 dev eth6 proto static
[root@...alhost ~]# ip neigh show
192.168.1.100 dev bond0 lladdr 64:31:50:3a:b0:b5 REACHABLE
>> [root@...alhost ~]# dmesg
>> [ 304.496463] bonding: Ethernet Channel Bonding Driver: v3.6.0
>> (September 26, 2009)
>> [ 304.496468] bonding: MII link monitoring set to 100 ms
>> [ 353.527680] ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): bond0: link is not ready
>> [ 355.321626] e1000: eth7 NIC Link is Up 1000 Mbps Full Duplex, Flow
>> Control: RX
>> [ 355.322250] bonding: bond0: enslaving eth7 as an active interface
>> with an up link.
>> [ 355.323503] ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): bond0: link becomes ready
>> [ 365.394052] bond0: no IPv6 routers present
>> [ 510.913797] e1000: eth8 NIC Link is Up 1000 Mbps Full Duplex, Flow
>> Control: RX
>> [ 510.917312] bonding: bond0: enslaving eth8 as an active interface
>> with an up link.
>> [ 592.208534] bonding: bond0: link status definitely down for interface
>> eth7, disabling it
>>
>> Now, if bonding driver works well, eth8 will be the active slave, and
>> the network connection is ok.
>> __But__ ...
>>
>> [pwp@...alhost ~]$ ping 192.168.1.100 -c 10
>> PING 192.168.1.100 (192.168.1.100) 56(84) bytes of data.
> > From 192.168.1.5 icmp_seq=10 Destination Host Unreachable
>> --- 192.168.1.100 ping statistics ---
>> 10 packets transmitted, 0 received, +1 errors, 100% packet loss, time 8999ms
>>
>> How strange!
>>
>> [root@...alhost ~]# ifconfig
>> bond0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 08:00:27:26:1B:DB
>> inet addr:192.168.1.5 Bcast:192.168.1.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
>> inet6 addr: fe80::a00:27ff:fe26:1bdb/64 Scope:Link
>> UP BROADCAST RUNNING MASTER MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
>> RX packets:357 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
>> TX packets:76 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
>> collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
>> RX bytes:42971 (41.9 KiB) TX bytes:9832 (9.6 KiB)
>>
>> eth8 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 08:00:27:26:1B:DB
>> inet addr:192.168.1.15 Bcast:192.168.1.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
>> UP BROADCAST RUNNING SLAVE MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
>> RX packets:163 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
>> TX packets:37 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
>> collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
>> RX bytes:19073 (18.6 KiB) TX bytes:5254 (5.1 KiB)
>>
>> [root@...alhost ~]# arp
>> Address HWtype HWaddress Flags
>> Mask Iface
>> corerouter.nay.redhat.c ether 00:1d:45:20:d5:ff
>> C eth6
>> 192.168.1.100
>> (incomplete) bond0
>>
>> I think maybe there is something wrong about arp.
>> So I run ping and tcpdump synchronously.
>>
>> [pwp@...alhost ~]$ ping 192.168.1.100 -c 10
>> PING 192.168.1.100 (192.168.1.100) 56(84) bytes of data.
> > From 192.168.1.5 icmp_seq=2 Destination Host Unreachable
> > From 192.168.1.5 icmp_seq=3 Destination Host Unreachable
> > From 192.168.1.5 icmp_seq=4 Destination Host Unreachable
> > From 192.168.1.5 icmp_seq=6 Destination Host Unreachable
> > From 192.168.1.5 icmp_seq=7 Destination Host Unreachable
> > From 192.168.1.5 icmp_seq=8 Destination Host Unreachable
> > From 192.168.1.5 icmp_seq=9 Destination Host Unreachable
> > From 192.168.1.5 icmp_seq=10 Destination Host Unreachable
>> --- 192.168.1.100 ping statistics ---
>> 10 packets transmitted, 0 received, +8 errors, 100% packet loss, time 9002ms
>> pipe 3
>>
>> And meanwhile,
>> [root@...alhost ~]# tcpdump -i bond0 -p arp
>> tcpdump: verbose output suppressed, use -v or -vv for full protocol decode
>> listening on bond0, link-type EN10MB (Ethernet), capture size 65535 bytes
>> 02:46:56.983092 ARP, Request who-has 192.168.1.100 tell 192.168.1.5,
>> length 28
> [...]
>
> At this point, does tcpdump on the host system see the incoming
> ARP requests?
Yes. On host,
[root@...alhost ~]# tcpdump -i eth0 -p arp
tcpdump: verbose output suppressed, use -v or -vv for full protocol decode
listening on eth0, link-type EN10MB (Ethernet), capture size 65535 bytes
11:21:01.721704 ARP, Request who-has 192.168.1.100 tell 192.168.1.5,
length 28
11:21:01.721714 ARP, Request who-has 192.168.1.100 tell 192.168.1.5,
length 28
11:21:02.723536 ARP, Request who-has 192.168.1.100 tell 192.168.1.5,
length 28
11:21:02.723548 ARP, Request who-has 192.168.1.100 tell 192.168.1.5,
length 28
11:21:03.019325 ARP, Request who-has 10.66.4.107 tell 10.66.4.108, length 46
11:21:04.018956 ARP, Request who-has 10.66.4.107 tell 10.66.4.108, length 46
11:21:04.720847 ARP, Request who-has 192.168.1.100 tell 192.168.1.5,
length 28
11:21:04.720856 ARP, Request who-has 192.168.1.100 tell 192.168.1.5,
length 28
11:21:05.018627 ARP, Request who-has 10.66.4.107 tell 10.66.4.108, length 46
11:21:05.722297 ARP, Request who-has 192.168.1.100 tell 192.168.1.5,
length 28
11:21:05.722308 ARP, Request who-has 192.168.1.100 tell 192.168.1.5,
length 28
11:21:06.724211 ARP, Request who-has 192.168.1.100 tell 192.168.1.5,
length 28
11:21:06.724220 ARP, Request who-has 192.168.1.100 tell 192.168.1.5,
length 28
^C
13 packets captured
13 packets received by filter
0 packets dropped by kernel
Maybe host doesn't reply ? I'm not sure.
regards
Weiping pan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists