[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4D76A345.9040200@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2011 22:44:37 +0100
From: Nicolas de Pesloüan
<nicolas.2p.debian@...il.com>
To: Andy Gospodarek <andy@...yhouse.net>
CC: Jiri Pirko <jpirko@...hat.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
davem@...emloft.net, shemminger@...ux-foundation.org,
kaber@...sh.net, fubar@...ibm.com, eric.dumazet@...il.com
Subject: Re: [patch net-next-2.6] net: reinject arps into bonding slave instead
of master
Le 08/03/2011 14:42, Andy Gospodarek a écrit :
> I'm pretty sure this patch will have the same catastrophic problem your
> last one did. By cloning and setting skb2->dev = orig_dev you just
> inserted a frame identical to the one we received right back into the
> stack. It only took a few minutes for my box to melt as one frame on
> the wire will cause an infinite number of frames to be received by the
> stack.
I agree with Andy. We still keep one reinject (netif_rx), which is probably better that two
(__netif_receive_skb), but not enough.
I really think we need a general framework for late delivery of final packets to packet handler
registered somewhere in the rx_handler path.
Jiri, is this patch the one you announced as "I have some kind nice solution in mind and I'm going
to submit that as a patch later (too many patches are in the wind atm)" ?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists