netdev - Re: bonding can't change to another slave if you ifdown the active slave

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <il58p9$3ka$2@dough.gmane.org>
Date:	Tue, 8 Mar 2011 12:51:54 +0000 (UTC)
From:	WANG Cong <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
To:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: bonding can't change to another slave if you ifdown the active
 slave

On Tue, 08 Mar 2011 14:52:52 +0800, Weiping Pan wrote:

> ok, I use "Host-only mode" and get
> 
> 
> 
> an conclusion, that if the first enslaved nic is pulled out, bonding
> can't handle well.
> 
> First test.
> I first enslave eth6, then pull it out, bonding doesn't work. on host,
...
> 
> 
> Second test
> I first enslave eth6, then pull eth7 out, bonding works well. on guest,

Can you show me your /proc/net/bonding/bond0 before and after pulling down
eth6 or eth7? And what does `ip link show` say?

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html