[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1103092250510.4471@swampdragon.chaosbits.net>
Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2011 22:55:05 +0100 (CET)
From: Jesper Juhl <jj@...osbits.net>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
cc: lvs-devel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, Wensong Zhang <wensong@...ux-vs.org>,
trivial@...nel.org
Subject: [PATCH] Fix variable assignment in ip_vs_notrack
There's no sense to 'ct = ct = ' in ip_vs_notrack(). Just assign
nf_ct_get()'s return value directly to the pointer variable 'ct' once.
Signed-off-by: Jesper Juhl <jj@...osbits.net>
---
ip_vs.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/include/net/ip_vs.h b/include/net/ip_vs.h
index b7bbd6c..269d1ef 100644
--- a/include/net/ip_vs.h
+++ b/include/net/ip_vs.h
@@ -1031,7 +1031,7 @@ static inline void ip_vs_notrack(struct sk_buff *skb)
{
#if defined(CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK) || defined(CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK_MODULE)
enum ip_conntrack_info ctinfo;
- struct nf_conn *ct = ct = nf_ct_get(skb, &ctinfo);
+ struct nf_conn *ct = nf_ct_get(skb, &ctinfo);
if (!ct || !nf_ct_is_untracked(ct)) {
nf_reset(skb);
--
Jesper Juhl <jj@...osbits.net> http://www.chaosbits.net/
Plain text mails only, please.
Don't top-post http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/T/top-post.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists