[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20110310.134908.226783215.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 13:49:08 -0800 (PST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: randy.dunlap@...cle.com
Cc: netdev@....de, shemminger@...ux-foundation.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.38-rc8 build failure] net: bridge builtin vs. ipv6
modular
From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 13:28:01 -0800
> This can be fixed in either of 2 ways. One way is to require that the
> bridge code building depend on how the IPV6 code is built (builtin or modular);
> the other way is to handle the kconfig variations in net/bridge/br_multicast.c --
> but this loses some functionality if IPV6=m and BRIDGE=y.
>
> I prefer the Kconfig patch over the br_multicast.c patch.
> Both patches are below for consideration.
I definitely prefer the Kconfig variant, although it's unfortunate that we
have a stateful dependency in the bridging multicast code.
IPV4 seems to let us use INADDR_ANY as the source address in the multicast
query, but IPV6 does not allow this (as per RFC 2710).
Anyways, I've applied the Kconfig patch, thanks Randy!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists