netdev - Re: [PATCH 1/8] macb: unify at91 and avr32 platform data

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20110310131724.GG6198@pulham.picochip.com>
Date:	Thu, 10 Mar 2011 13:17:24 +0000
From:	Jamie Iles <jamie@...ieiles.com>
To:	Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>
Cc:	Jamie Iles <jamie@...ieiles.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] macb: unify at91 and avr32 platform data

On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 02:06:04PM +0100, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
> On 3/10/2011 11:10 AM, Jamie Iles :
> > --- a/drivers/net/macb.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/macb.c
> > @@ -18,12 +18,10 @@
> >  #include <linux/netdevice.h>
> >  #include <linux/etherdevice.h>
> >  #include <linux/dma-mapping.h>
> > +#include <linux/platform_data/macb.h>
> >  #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> >  #include <linux/phy.h>
> >  
> > -#include <mach/board.h>
> > -#include <mach/cpu.h>
> 
> I did not bouble check but do we need no more cpu_is_ macros?

No, I couldn't see any in there and it builds for all of the AT91 
targets and all of the AVR32 ones that I tried.  I can't see any macros 
in there that are likely to use cpu_is_* internally either.

Jamie
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html