netdev - Re: [net-next-2.6 PATCH] if_link: Add PORT_REQUEST

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <C99D746F.218CD%roprabhu@cisco.com>
Date:	Wed, 09 Mar 2011 18:16:15 -0800
From:	roprabhu <roprabhu@...co.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC:	<netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [net-next-2.6 PATCH] if_link: Add PORT_REQUEST_MAX




On 3/9/11 12:49 PM, "David Miller" <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:

> From: Roopa Prabhu <roprabhu@...co.com>
> Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2011 12:34:31 -0800
> 
>> From: Roopa Prabhu <roprabhu@...co.com>
>> 
>> This patch adds __PORT_REQUEST_MAX to port request enumeration. And defines
>> PORT_REQUEST_MAX.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Roopa Prabhu <roprabhu@...co.com>
>> Signed-off-by: David Wang <dwang2@...co.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Christian Benvenuti <benve@...co.com>
> 
> Why?
> 
> If some new request types get added, this max value will increase and
> we don't want that to happen for things exposed to userspace.
> 
> Userspace should really not depend upon how many requests there are.

O ok. Did not know the reason why its was not there. Point taken. Pls
ignore. Thanks. 


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html