[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110311063649.GA13293@elte.hu>
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 07:36:49 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT] Networking
* Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 04:51:34PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> >
> > The reasons can be any of:
> >
> > - "I don't want to get too far away from upstream". This is very
> > understandable, but I have asked people to please _not_ merge "random
> > trees of the day". Please use major releases for this (or, if worst
> > comes to worst, -rc releases) rather than just do something else.
>
> What are you throughts on starting work from a tree. Most of my work is usually
> based off of some branch in tip, but sometimes when I'm pulling in patches that
> are not really related to anything, I just simply grab whatever the latest Linus
> branch is and start from there.
>
> Is it preferable to instead start from one of the official releases?
Yes, for clarity of merge history i'm generally asking all people who send pull
requests to -tip to use official -rc's as bases (or -tip branches), *not* some
random daily -git snapshot. If a -git snapshot has to be merged for a good reason
then please amend the merge commit with the Merge-Reason tag describing the good
reason you had.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists