[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110311085605.GK6198@pulham.picochip.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 08:56:05 +0000
From: Jamie Iles <jamie@...ieiles.com>
To: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@...osoft.com>
Cc: Jamie Iles <jamie@...ieiles.com>,
Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] macb: unify at91 and avr32 platform data
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 02:41:40AM +0100, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
> On 13:17 Thu 10 Mar , Jamie Iles wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 02:06:04PM +0100, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
> > > On 3/10/2011 11:10 AM, Jamie Iles :
> > > > --- a/drivers/net/macb.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/net/macb.c
> > > > @@ -18,12 +18,10 @@
> > > > #include <linux/netdevice.h>
> > > > #include <linux/etherdevice.h>
> > > > #include <linux/dma-mapping.h>
> > > > +#include <linux/platform_data/macb.h>
> > > > #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> > > > #include <linux/phy.h>
> > > >
> > > > -#include <mach/board.h>
> > > > -#include <mach/cpu.h>
> > >
> > > I did not bouble check but do we need no more cpu_is_ macros?
> >
> > No, I couldn't see any in there and it builds for all of the AT91
> > targets and all of the AVR32 ones that I tried. I can't see any macros
> > in there that are likely to use cpu_is_* internally either.
>
> keep as we need to remove the #ifdef AT91 to cpu_is
>
> I've patch for this
Is this for the user IO register where the value written is conditional
on both RMII/MII and arch type?
Jamie
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists