[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110311132536.GE7357@pulham.picochip.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 13:25:36 +0000
From: Jamie Iles <jamie@...ieiles.com>
To: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@...osoft.com>
Cc: Jamie Iles <jamie@...ieiles.com>,
Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] macb: unify at91 and avr32 platform data
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 01:52:46PM +0100, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
> On 08:56 Fri 11 Mar , Jamie Iles wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 02:41:40AM +0100, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
> > > keep as we need to remove the #ifdef AT91 to cpu_is
> > >
> > > I've patch for this
> >
> > Is this for the user IO register where the value written is conditional
> > on both RMII/MII and arch type?
> yes for
>
> #if defined(CONFIG_ARCH_AT91)
> macb_writel(bp, USRIO, (MACB_BIT(RMII) | MACB_BIT(CLKEN)));
> #else
> macb_writel(bp, USRIO, 0);
> #endif
> else
> #if defined(CONFIG_ARCH_AT91)
> macb_writel(bp, USRIO, MACB_BIT(CLKEN));
> #else
> macb_writel(bp, USRIO, MACB_BIT(MII));
> #endif
Ok, but what about non-AT91/AVR32 systems? They may not have a
mach/cpu.h and won't have cpu_is_foo() for the platforms the driver is
interested in.
Could we supply these values in the platform data so the driver doesn't
need to do any cpu_is_ magic?
Jamie
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists