netdev - Re: [GIT] Networking

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <AANLkTikiy+hNgG=BRWKkHEHCdvJnffWP6nhp1XxsEEO+@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 11 Mar 2011 10:40:23 +1000
From:	Dave Airlie <airlied@...il.com>
To:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT] Networking

On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 10:34 AM, Linus Torvalds
<torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 4:29 PM, Linus Torvalds
> <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>>
>> Oh well. Water under the bridge. I think I'll try --no-ff this once,
>> despite my misgivings about the concept.
>
> Oh wow. That really does end up looking odd. I know some other git
> projects use --no-ff, but I don't think we've ever had them in the
> kernel, and I've never see the graph look like that before.
>
> But it did allow me to add an explanation for what happened, so maybe
> it's worth it.

I didn't realise we weren't meant to --no-ff, I've been lately using
--no-ff --log
so I can keep track of what I merged easier, when someone bases something on my
tree and I haven't moved it in a while.

Though I suppose author/committer info should tell me this I've found
having the logs
at least a bit useful.

Dave.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html