[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1300134277.2649.19.camel@edumazet-laptop>
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2011 21:24:37 +0100
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@...il.com>
Cc: Dave Täht <d@...t.net>,
bloat-devel <bloat-devel@...ts.bufferbloat.net>,
bloat <bloat@...ts.bufferbloat.net>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Bloat] shaper team forming up
Le lundi 14 mars 2011 à 21:55 +0200, Jonathan Morton a écrit :
> On 14 Mar, 2011, at 9:26 pm, Dave Täht wrote:
>
> > Over the weekend, Dan Siemons uncovered a possible bad interaction
> > between ECN and the default pfifo_fast qdisc in Linux.
> >
> > http://www.coverfire.com/archives/2011/03/13/pfifo_fast-and-ecn/
>
> This seems to be more complicated that it appears. It looks as though
> Linux has re-used the LSB of the old TOS field for some "link local"
> flag which is used by routing.
>
> It's not immediately obvious whether pfifo_fast is using this new
> interpretation though. If it isn't, the fix should be to remove the
> RTO_ONLINK bit from the mask it's using on the tos field. The other
> half of the mask correctly excludes the ECN bits from the field.
>
CC netdev, where linux network dev can take a look.
I would say that this is a wrong analysis :
1) ECN uses two low order bits of TOS byte
2) pfifo_fast uses skb->priority
skb->priority = rt_tos2priority(iph->tos);
#define IPTOS_TOS_MASK 0x1E
#define IPTOS_TOS(tos) ((tos)&IPTOS_TOS_MASK)
static inline char rt_tos2priority(u8 tos)
{
return ip_tos2prio[IPTOS_TOS(tos)>>1];
}
No interference between two mechanisms, unless sysadmin messed up things
(skb_edit)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists