[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20110314144954.b87fdd64.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2011 14:49:54 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
bugzilla-daemon@...zilla.kernel.org,
bugme-daemon@...zilla.kernel.org, lipski.bogdan@...il.com
Subject: Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 30952] New: asix driver broken since 2.6.35
On Mon, 14 Mar 2011 14:45:53 -0700 (PDT)
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
> From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
> Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2011 14:43:09 -0700
>
> >
> > (switched to email. Please respond via emailed reply-to-all, not via the
> > bugzilla web interface).
> >
> > The reporter says "workaround suggested in:
> > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16831 seems to work well
> > for me as well". That workaround appears to be "dump the kernel driver
> > and use the driver off the vendor's website".
>
> This is an issue you've brought up to me several months ago.
>
> I started looking into it, but because the vendor driver development
> happens in a completely different universe the divergence noise is
> substantial and it's a huge effort to consolidate these two drivers.
>
> I think that until the vendor starts to care, nothing is going to
> happen to resolve these ASIC driver bugs.
Yup. I suppose an alternative approach might be to feed the current
vendor driver through the drivers/staging process (preferably with
their assistance!) then run with two alternative drivers for a
while and eventually remove the old one.
But that's without having looked at the vendor code. Is it a Big Mess?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists