netdev - [PATCH 1/4] netfilter: xt_connlimit: fix daddr connlimit in SNAT scenario

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1300085414-27275-1-git-send-email-xiaosuo@gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 14 Mar 2011 14:50:11 +0800
From:	Changli Gao <xiaosuo@...il.com>
To:	Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
Cc:	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	Changli Gao <xiaosuo@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] netfilter: xt_connlimit: fix daddr connlimit in SNAT scenario

We use the reply tuples when limiting the connections by the destination
addresses, however, in SNAT scenario, the final reply tuples won't be
ready until SNAT is done in POSTROUING or INPUT chain, and the following
nf_conntrack_find_get() in count_tem() will get nothing, so connlimit
can't work as expected.

In this patch, the original tuples are always used, and an additional
member addr is appended to save the address in either end.

Signed-off-by: Changli Gao <xiaosuo@...il.com>
---
 net/netfilter/xt_connlimit.c |   20 +++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/netfilter/xt_connlimit.c b/net/netfilter/xt_connlimit.c
index e029c48..1f4b9f9 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/xt_connlimit.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/xt_connlimit.c
@@ -33,8 +33,9 @@
 
 /* we will save the tuples of all connections we care about */
 struct xt_connlimit_conn {
-	struct list_head list;
-	struct nf_conntrack_tuple tuple;
+	struct list_head		list;
+	struct nf_conntrack_tuple	tuple;
+	union nf_inet_addr		addr;
 };
 
 struct xt_connlimit_data {
@@ -151,7 +152,7 @@ static int count_them(struct net *net,
 			continue;
 		}
 
-		if (same_source_net(addr, mask, &conn->tuple.src.u3, family))
+		if (same_source_net(addr, mask, &conn->addr, family))
 			/* same source network -> be counted! */
 			++matches;
 		nf_ct_put(found_ct);
@@ -165,6 +166,7 @@ static int count_them(struct net *net,
 		if (conn == NULL)
 			return -ENOMEM;
 		conn->tuple = *tuple;
+		conn->addr = *addr;
 		list_add(&conn->list, hash);
 		++matches;
 	}
@@ -185,15 +187,11 @@ connlimit_mt(const struct sk_buff *skb, struct xt_action_param *par)
 	int connections;
 
 	ct = nf_ct_get(skb, &ctinfo);
-	if (ct != NULL) {
-		if (info->flags & XT_CONNLIMIT_DADDR)
-			tuple_ptr = &ct->tuplehash[IP_CT_DIR_REPLY].tuple;
-		else
-			tuple_ptr = &ct->tuplehash[IP_CT_DIR_ORIGINAL].tuple;
-	} else if (!nf_ct_get_tuplepr(skb, skb_network_offset(skb),
-				    par->family, &tuple)) {
+	if (ct != NULL)
+		tuple_ptr = &ct->tuplehash[IP_CT_DIR_ORIGINAL].tuple;
+	else if (!nf_ct_get_tuplepr(skb, skb_network_offset(skb),
+				    par->family, &tuple))
 		goto hotdrop;
-	}
 
 	if (par->family == NFPROTO_IPV6) {
 		const struct ipv6hdr *iph = ipv6_hdr(skb);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html