netdev - Re: [PATCH] net: drop NETIF_F_GSO from hw_features without NETIF_F

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 18 Mar 2011 21:43:23 +0100
From:	Michał Mirosław <mirqus@...il.com>
To:	Roger Luethi <rl@...lgate.ch>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: drop NETIF_F_GSO from hw_features without NETIF_F_SG

2011/3/18 Roger Luethi <rl@...lgate.ch>:
> register_netdevice() removes NETIF_F_GSO from dev->features and
> dev->wanted_features for hardware without NETIF_F_SG to "avoid warning from
> netdev_fix_features()".
>
> However, as the flag remains set in dev->hw_features, users trying to
> enable GSO via ethtool will still end up with NETIF_F_GSO stuck in
> wanted_features, resulting in a warning every time they try to change any
> feature (until they use ethtool to "disable" GSO):

That's expected, as it allows the user to debug why his request didn't
work as expected. I think that those messages should get demoted to
DEBUG if that's too noisy. The network core imposed conditions could
be explained in Documentation/ or ethtool manpage instead.

Best Regards,
Michał Mirosław
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html