netdev - Re: LRO disable warnings on kernel 2.6.38

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4D8385CE.1060205@intel.com>
Date:	Fri, 18 Mar 2011 09:18:22 -0700
From:	Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@...el.com>
To:	Jesper Dangaard Brouer <jdb@...x.dk>
CC:	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
	Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>
Subject: Re: LRO disable warnings on kernel 2.6.38

On 3/18/2011 4:12 AM, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> Hi
>
> I'm seeing the LRO disable warnings using kernel 2.6.38:
>
> [    8.664759] NET: Registered protocol family 10
> [    8.838148] ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): eth71: link is not ready
> [    8.872639] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> [    8.872645] WARNING: at net/core/dev.c:1363 dev_disable_lro+0x7b/0x80()
> [    8.872647] Hardware name: ProLiant DL370 G6
> [    8.872648] Modules linked in: ipv6 nf_conntrack ip_tables loop i7core_edac edac_core ipmi_si ipmi_msghandler joydev hpilo pcspkr sg hpsa igb ata_piix netxen_nic dca [last unloaded: scsi_wait_scan]
> [    8.872660] Pid: 2221, comm: sysctl Not tainted 2.6.38-comx04 #2
> [    8.872662] Call Trace:
> [    8.872671]  [<ffffffff81056e1f>] ? warn_slowpath_common+0x7f/0xc0
> [    8.872675]  [<ffffffff81056e7a>] ? warn_slowpath_null+0x1a/0x20
> [    8.872680]  [<ffffffff8140c0ab>] ? dev_disable_lro+0x7b/0x80
> [    8.872686]  [<ffffffff81474f27>] ? devinet_sysctl_forward+0x147/0x180
> [    8.872691]  [<ffffffff811872f7>] ? proc_sys_call_handler+0x97/0xd0
> [    8.872700]  [<ffffffff81187344>] ? proc_sys_write+0x14/0x20
> [    8.872704]  [<ffffffff81124148>] ? vfs_write+0xc8/0x180
> [    8.872707]  [<ffffffff81124301>] ? sys_write+0x51/0x90
> [    8.872712]  [<ffffffff8100b8c2>] ? system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
> [    8.872714] ---[ end trace 6245283cb8d484cc ]---
>
> The strange part is that I didn't see this warning on my testlab and
> pre-prod servers.  The warning is from the first production server,
> which got kernel 2.6.38 deployed this morning.
>
> The NIC driver is igb.
>
> The only difference in hardware between the production and
> pre-production server (which didn't show the warning), is the
> prod-server have an extra dual-port original Intel NIC, dev-named
> "eth71".  And its just after the init of eth71, the warning occurs.
>
> We usually use a 6 port NIC from Hotlava, which is based on the same
> chip 82576 and also uses the same igb driver.
>
> Intel orig NIC eth71
>   albpd4:~# ethtool -i eth71
>   driver: igb
>   version: 2.1.0-k2
>   firmware-version: 1.2-1
>   bus-info: 0000:21:00.0
>
> Hotlava Intel chip based NIC eth51:
>   albpd4:~# ethtool -i eth51
>   driver: igb
>   version: 2.1.0-k2
>   firmware-version: 1.2-1
>   bus-info: 0000:1d:00.1
>
> I don't understand why I don't see the warning on my pre-prod server,
> which only have the Hotlava NIC?!?
>

The error doesn't make any sense for igb to be triggering since it 
doesn't support setting the NETIF_F_LRO flag in the 2.6.38 kernel.

By any chance are there any ixgbe or other interfaces in the system?  I 
would suspect the error to come from a driver that at least contains the 
NETIF_F_LRO flag.

Thanks,

Alex

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html