[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <49395329523DD64492581B505F80C86D5A5BCD38EC@EXMAIL.ad.emulex.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2011 01:04:38 -0700
From: <Ajit.Khaparde@...lex.Com>
To: <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
CC: <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH ethtool] ethtool: Report driver features described in
struct ethtool_drvinfo
_______________________________________
From: Ben Hutchings [bhutchings@...arflare.com]
Sent: Friday, March 18, 2011 5:44 PM
To: Khaparde, Ajit
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH ethtool] ethtool: Report driver features described in struct ethtool_drvinfo
On Fri, 2011-03-18 at 15:07 -0700, Ajit.Khaparde@...lex.Com wrote:
>> ________________________________________
>> From: Ben Hutchings [bhutchings@...arflare.com]
>> Sent: Friday, March 18, 2011 5:00 PM
>> To: Khaparde, Ajit
>> Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
>> Subject: RE: [RFC] ethtool: Display reg dump length via get driver info.
>>
>> > On Fri, 2011-03-18 at 14:52 -0700, Ajit.Khaparde@...lex.Com wrote:
>> >> ______________________________________
>> >> From: Ben Hutchings [bhutchings@...arflare.com]
>> >> Sent: Friday, March 18, 2011 4:32 PM
>> >> To: Khaparde, Ajit
>> >> Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
>> >> Subject: Re: [RFC] ethtool: Display reg dump length via get driver info.
> >>
> >> On Fri, 2011-03-18 at 16:06 -0500, Ajit Khaparde wrote:
> >> >> Devices like BE store Reg Dump Data in the hardware.
> >>
> > >> Where else would it be?
>> >>
>> >> Well yes. That's true.
>> >>
>> >> >> This change will allow to just peek into the hardware
>> >> >> to see if any data is available for a dump and analysis,
>> >> >> without actually dumping the register data.
>> >> > [...]
>> >>
>> >> > This is wrong. ethtool_ops::get_regs_len really should return a
>> >> > constant, otherwise ethtool (and the kernel) cannot allocate a buffer of
>> >> > the right size. If the size of a dump really does vary then make it
>> >> > return the maximum possible size for the device.
>> >>
>> >> Yes, it is a constant size. And will always be the max size possible.
>> >> I just want to see if I can get the length, without really making the ethtoool -d call.
>> >> Because that will trigger the dump too.
>> >> At that moment, I may not be interested in the data itself.
>>
>> > OK, so what you're really interested in is 'does this version of the
>> > driver support register dump'?
>>
>> Yes. I did not want to add another option in ethtool to get this info out.
>
> So, how about this?
> Ben.
> ---
> ETHTOOL_GDRVINFO fills out struct ethtool_drvinfo with the size of the
> data returned by various other operations. The size should be non-zero
> if and only if the driver implements that operation. Therefore, we can
> report whether the driver supports certain operations without actually
> trying them (which may be expensive and disruptive).
>
> Do this in dump_drvinfo() rather than adding a separation operation.
This one is fine too.
Though I would have liked the other one where it displays either zero or the max value.
You could add Acked-by:
Ajit Khaparde <ajit.khaparde@...lex.com>
-Ajit
> ---
> ethtool.c | 12 ++++++++++--
> 1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/ethtool.c b/ethtool.c
> index e9cb2c9..32df0ee 100644
> --- a/ethtool.c
> +++ b/ethtool.c
> @@ -1423,11 +1423,19 @@ static int dump_drvinfo(struct ethtool_drvinfo *info)
> "driver: %s\n"
> "version: %s\n"
> "firmware-version: %s\n"
> - "bus-info: %s\n",
> + "bus-info: %s\n"
> + "supports-statistics: %s\n"
> + "supports-test: %s\n"
> + "supports-eeprom-access: %s\n"
> + "supports-register-dump: %s\n",
> info->driver,
> info->version,
> info->fw_version,
> - info->bus_info);
> + info->bus_info,
> + info->n_stats ? "yes" : "no",
> + info->testinfo_len ? "yes" : "no",
> + info->eedump_len ? "yes" : "no",
> + info->regdump_len ? "yes" : "no");
>
> return 0;
> }
> ---
> --
>Ben Hutchings, Senior Software Engineer, Solarflare
>Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job.
>They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists