[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20110319.214100.183043711.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2011 21:41:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: hagen@...u.net
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, eric.dumazet@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] socket: increase default maximum listen queue length
From: Hagen Paul Pfeifer <hagen@...u.net>
Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2011 02:50:11 +0100
> For real server work the defacto sysctl_somaxconn limit seems inadequate:
>
> Experiments with real servers show, that it is absolutely not enough
> even at 100conn/sec. 256 cures most of problems.
What in the world is a server running on multi-GHZ cpus doing such
that it cannot accept() fast enough to keep up with a 100 connections
per second?
We were handling that just fine 10+ years ago.
The math simply doesn't add up.
Either your numbers are wrong or the server design is brain-dead.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists