[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110321075421.GA27581@secunet.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 08:54:21 +0100
From: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
To: Wei Yongjun <yjwei@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: xfrm: Fix initialize repl field of struct xfrm_state
Thanks for catching this!
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 02:49:14PM +0800, Wei Yongjun wrote:
> > Ok, thanks for the explanation.
> >
> > I think there is a simple way out of this:
> >
> > 1) Rename current xfrm_init_state to __xfrm_init_state, add
> > "bool init_replay" argument. Add the xfrm_init_replay()
> > call, as in your patch, but conditionalized on this boolean.
> >
> > 2) Implement xfrm_init_state as inline, which calls
> > __xfrm_init_state(..., true)
> >
> > 3) Replace xfrm_init_state() call in xfrm_user.c with
> > __xfrm_init_state(..., false)
> >
> > This seems to avoid all the problems. We don't need to touch every
> > caller, and we avoid initializing the replay state twice in xfrm_user
> >
> > Ok?
>
> This OK, I will do this change, thanks.
>
This looks ok for me too. I just noticed that we also need to clone the
replay_esn/preplay_esn informations and to reinitialize the sequence
number counting on XFRM MIGRATE from the original state before we
call xfrm_init_replay.
I'll fix this up once your patch is applied.
Thanks,
Steffen
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists