[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110321082512.GB27581@secunet.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 09:25:12 +0100
From: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: yjwei@...fujitsu.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: xfrm: Fix initialize repl field of struct xfrm_state
On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 11:46:06PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
>
> Ok, thanks for the explanation.
>
> I think there is a simple way out of this:
>
> 1) Rename current xfrm_init_state to __xfrm_init_state, add
> "bool init_replay" argument. Add the xfrm_init_replay()
> call, as in your patch, but conditionalized on this boolean.
>
> 2) Implement xfrm_init_state as inline, which calls
> __xfrm_init_state(..., true)
>
> 3) Replace xfrm_init_state() call in xfrm_user.c with
> __xfrm_init_state(..., false)
>
> This seems to avoid all the problems. We don't need to touch every
> caller, and we avoid initializing the replay state twice in xfrm_user
>
Btw, looking a bit closer to this. I think it would look a bit cleaner
if we would add the xfrm_init_replay() call to xfrm_init_state() and
to move the xfrm_init_state() call in xfrm_state_construct() behind
the assign of the replay settings.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists