| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20110322163917.GD10058@pulham.picochip.com> Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 16:39:17 +0000 From: Jamie Iles <jamie@...ieiles.com> To: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@...osoft.com> Cc: Jamie Iles <jamie@...ieiles.com>, Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>, netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, Andrew Victor <linux@...im.org.za>, Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@...site.dk> Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 0/9] macb: add support for Cadence GEM Hi Jean-Christophe, On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 05:18:11PM +0100, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: > On 11:18 Mon 21 Mar , Jamie Iles wrote: > > I have an existing tree for this at > > > > git://github.com/jamieiles/linux-2.6-ji.git macb-gem > > > > based off of 2.6.38 (with your ACK's now added) and I'd be happy with > > either route. > but we must detect the gem via the version register and ditto for macb for > avr32 and at91 > > so please rebase it over my patch > > and you get my sob too Would you mind respinning your patch without the changes to the clk stuff? Otherwise we're changing it from compile time to version based, only to completely remove it in subsequent patches. Also, can you confirm that the module ID's that you are using to differentiate between AT91 and AVR32 won't clash with MACB uses in other, non-at91/avr32 chips, or that it doesn't matter? Jamie -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists