[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110322163917.GD10058@pulham.picochip.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 16:39:17 +0000
From: Jamie Iles <jamie@...ieiles.com>
To: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@...osoft.com>
Cc: Jamie Iles <jamie@...ieiles.com>,
Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Andrew Victor <linux@...im.org.za>,
Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@...site.dk>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 0/9] macb: add support for Cadence GEM
Hi Jean-Christophe,
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 05:18:11PM +0100, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
> On 11:18 Mon 21 Mar , Jamie Iles wrote:
> > I have an existing tree for this at
> >
> > git://github.com/jamieiles/linux-2.6-ji.git macb-gem
> >
> > based off of 2.6.38 (with your ACK's now added) and I'd be happy with
> > either route.
> but we must detect the gem via the version register and ditto for macb for
> avr32 and at91
>
> so please rebase it over my patch
>
> and you get my sob too
Would you mind respinning your patch without the changes to the clk
stuff? Otherwise we're changing it from compile time to version based,
only to completely remove it in subsequent patches.
Also, can you confirm that the module ID's that you are using to
differentiate between AT91 and AVR32 won't clash with MACB uses in
other, non-at91/avr32 chips, or that it doesn't matter?
Jamie
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists