netdev - Re: [PATCH v2] net/unix: Add secdata to unix

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <201103231816.46266.paul.moore@hp.com>
Date:	Wed, 23 Mar 2011 18:16:46 -0400
From:	Paul Moore <paul.moore@...com>
To:	Pat Kane <pekane52@...il.com>
Cc:	Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>,
	Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	cxzhang@...son.ibm.com, sds@...ho.nsa.gov, jmorris@...ei.org,
	eparis@...isplace.org, LSM <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] net/unix: Add secdata to unix_stream msgs

On Wednesday, March 23, 2011 4:23:35 PM Pat Kane wrote:
>   >> On Tue, 2011-03-22 at 19:32 -0700, David Miller wrote:
>   >>> The SELINUX hook implementations even have "_dgram()" in their names.
> 
> The LSM hook that I am having problems with, and that the patch fixes
> is  "secid_to_secctx()"  not "socket_getpeersec_dgram()".

Can you explain the problem you are having?  I'm specifically interested in 
who is calling secid_to_secctx() on a AF_UNIX stream packet.

Adding the secid token to a AF_UNIX stream packet isn't likely to be the right 
solution, although until we hear what the core problem is, I'm not sure we can 
offer any fixes.

--
paul moore
linux @ hp
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html