netdev - Re: [RFC] usbnet: use eth%d name for known ethernet devices

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4D8A8471.9060904@gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 23 Mar 2011 16:38:25 -0700
From:	Steve Calfee <stevecalfee@...il.com>
To:	Michal Nazarewicz <mnazarewicz@...il.com>
CC:	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com,
	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@...aro.org>,
	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
	David Brownell <dbrownell@...rs.sourceforge.net>,
	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>, grant.likely@...retlab.ca,
	Linux USB list <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
	andy.green@...aro.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
	roger.quadros@...ia.com,
	Jaswinder Singh <jaswinder.singh@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] usbnet: use eth%d name for known ethernet devices

On 03/23/11 16:17, Michal Nazarewicz wrote:
>>>>>>> @@ -97,6 +97,8 @@ struct driver_info {
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>   #define FLAG_LINK_INTR       0x0800          /* updates link (carrier) status */
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> +#define FLAG_PTP     0x1000          /* maybe use "usb%d" names */
>
>>>>> On Wednesday 23 March 2011 19:46:50 Greg KH wrote:
>>>>>> "PTP"?  What does that stand for?
>
>>>> On Mar 23, 2011 8:36 PM, "Arnd Bergmann"<arnd@...db.de>  wrote:
>>>>> point-to-point, I'll improve the comment to spell it out when
>>>>> I send the fixed version.
>
>>> On Wednesday 23 March 2011 20:53:13 Michał Nazarewicz wrote:
>>>> I think P2P could be better.
>
>> On Wed, 23 Mar 2011 20:57:18 +0100 Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>> Yes, good idea.
>
> Randy Dunlap<rdunlap@...otime.net>  writes:
>> that's peer-to-peer.
>>
>> OTOH, I knew that PTP was point-to-point.
>
> It can be any of that, depending on context.  For me PTP is more like
> Picture Transport Protocol, whereas "2" between two letters is usually
> "to".
>
Well, my 2 cents, picture transport protocol is so obviously different 
than flags for network interfaces it does not cause a mental collision. 
However P2P is about to become a huge wifi issue, which definitely is in 
the network space. So don't confuse things in the near future, don't use 
P2P.

Maybe a completely different, not so overused flag name would be better.

Regards, Steve


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html