[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20110323125958.76285c0f.rdunlap@xenotime.net>
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 12:59:58 -0700
From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: Michał Nazarewicz <mnazarewicz@...il.com>,
broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@...aro.org>,
Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
David Brownell <dbrownell@...rs.sourceforge.net>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>, grant.likely@...retlab.ca,
Linux USB list <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
andy.green@...aro.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
roger.quadros@...ia.com,
Jaswinder Singh <jaswinder.singh@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] usbnet: use eth%d name for known ethernet devices
On Wed, 23 Mar 2011 20:57:18 +0100 Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wednesday 23 March 2011 20:53:13 Michał Nazarewicz wrote:
> > On Mar 23, 2011 8:36 PM, "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wednesday 23 March 2011 19:46:50 Greg KH wrote:
> > > > > @@ -97,6 +97,8 @@ struct driver_info {
> > > > >
> > > > > #define FLAG_LINK_INTR 0x0800 /* updates link (carrier) status */
> > > > >
> > > > > +#define FLAG_PTP 0x1000 /* maybe use "usb%d" names */
> > > >
> > > > "PTP"? What does that stand for?
> > >
> > > point-to-point, I'll improve the comment to spell it out when I send the
> > > fixed version.
> >
> > I think P2P could be better.
>
> Yes, good idea.
that's peer-to-peer.
OTOH, I knew that PTP was point-to-point.
---
~Randy
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists