netdev - RE: c_can: TX handling

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1300964201.3295.16.camel@localhost>
Date:	Thu, 24 Mar 2011 11:56:41 +0100
From:	Jan Altenberg <jan@...utronix.de>
To:	Bhupesh SHARMA <bhupesh.sharma@...com>
Cc:	"wg@...ndegger.com" <wg@...ndegger.com>,
	"kurt.van.dijck@....be" <kurt.van.dijck@....be>,
	"b.spranger@...utronix.de" <b.spranger@...utronix.de>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	jan@...utronix.de
Subject: RE: c_can: TX handling

Hi,

> Thanks for your work on c_can.
> This week has been very busy for me, so please excuse me for the late reply.

No problem.

> Just to better understand this can you send me your *candump* output
> when you see that the message object put earlier in the message RAM
> being pending on the line.
> 
> Your point seems valid but I want to make sure that this is not done by the 
> C_CAN core implicitly..  

I'll try to prepare a (stripped down) test-case, but since I'm quite
busy at the moment, that might take a couple of days.
I'm quite sure, I've seen such a situation, but first of all, I'd like
to sort out, if that was related to the "DA mode".

Cheers,
	Jan

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html