[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4D8DDA06.4040704@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2011 13:20:22 +0100
From: Nicolas de Pesloüan
<nicolas.2p.debian@...il.com>
To: Leonardo Borda <leonardo.borda@...onical.com>
CC: Nicolas de Pesloüan
<nicolas.2p.debian@...e.fr>,
Bridge <bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
bonding-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Jiri Pirko <jpirko@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [Bonding-devel] bonding inside a bridge does not work when using
arp monitoring
Le 23/03/2011 22:13, Leonardo Borda a écrit :
> Hi Nicolas,
>
> Thank you for answering my question.
> Actually this is what I want to achieve:
>
> eth0----+ +----bond0.100----br0-100---{+virtual machines
> | |
> +----bond0----+----br0---(LAN)
> | |
> eth1----+ +----bond0.200----br0-200---{+virtual machines
Hi Leonardo,
I'm not sure recent kernels allow for a given interface to be a port for a bridge and the base
interface for vlan interfaces at the same time. This might be particularly true for 2.6.38 or
2.6.38+, because of the new rx_handler usage.
cc: netdev and Jiri Pirko, for advices. For the history of the thread, see:
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_name=1300914794.32252.68.camel%40bordalnx&
forum_name=bonding-devel
> br0 --> br0 in my understanding is an untagged vlan therefore it
> provides access to my LAN. So i am able to access that server from my
> internal network.
> br0-100 and br0-200 -> Vlans over a bridged interface will allow me to
> have many virtual machines in the same vlan on each bridged interface.
>
> I am misunderstanding concepts, maybe?
> If you need to do further tests I have a test environment ready for use.
>
> Leonardo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists