[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110328144837.GB4037@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 16:48:37 +0200
From: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@...hat.com>
To: Jon Mason <jdmason@...zu.us>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
Jesse Gross <jesse@...ira.com>,
Amit Kumar Salecha <amit.salecha@...gic.com>,
Shreyas Bhatewara <sbhatewara@...are.com>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...x.dk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: fix ethtool->set_flags not intended -EINVAL return
value
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 09:21:57AM -0500, Jon Mason wrote:
> > - if (data & ~ETH_FLAG_RXHASH)
> > - return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > + if (ethtool_invalid_flags(dev, data, ETH_FLAG_RXHASH))
> > + return -EINVAL;
>
> The return code value is being changed, which is not relevant to this
> patch. Perhaps a secondary patch should be created to make all driver
> set_flags calls return EOPNOTSUPP for unsupported flag setting.
Linux network developers agree some time ago that EINVAL should be used
in this case.
Stanislaw
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists