[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4D90B3B0.2010401@pengutronix.de>
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 18:13:36 +0200
From: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
To: Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@...ndegger.com>
CC: socketcan-users@...ts.berlios.de, Netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: poll broken (for can) (was: Re: [Socketcan-users] Multiple programs
trying to access the socket)
On 03/28/2011 05:55 PM, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
>> BTW: I figured out why poll() wakes you up but the next write will fail
>> with -ENOBUFS again.
>
> Ah, I'm curious? I also did realize that poll does burn CPU cycles
> (instead of waiting).
The poll callback checks if the used memory is less than the half of per
socket snd buffer (IIRC ~60K). See:
datagram_poll (http://lxr.linux.no/linux+v2.6.38/net/core/datagram.c#L737)
sock_writeable (http://lxr.linux.no/linux+v2.6.38/include/net/sock.h#L1618)
Because the size of a can frame (+the skb overhead) is much less then
the ethernet frame (+overhead) the default value for the snd buffer is
too big for can.
We get the -ENOBUF from write() if the tx_queue_len (default 10) is
exceeded.
http://lxr.linux.no/linux+v2.6.38/drivers/net/can/dev.c#L435
http://lxr.linux.no/linux+v2.6.38/net/can/af_can.c#L268
cheers, Marc
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Marc Kleine-Budde |
Industrial Linux Solutions | Phone: +49-231-2826-924 |
Vertretung West/Dortmund | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | http://www.pengutronix.de |
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (263 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists