| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <m1ei5rghqd.fsf@fess.ebiederm.org> Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 12:36:26 -0700 From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman) To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org, greearb@...delatech.com, arnd@...db.de, kaber@...sh.net, Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...e.fr> Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: Handle gso packets in dev_forward_skb Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> writes: > Le dimanche 27 mars 2011 à 18:09 -0700, David Miller a écrit : >> From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman) >> Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 15:00:56 -0700 >> >> > Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> writes: >> > >> >> Hmm, did you follow http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/86815/ >> >> discussion ? >> > >> > No. It seems I missed it, but I do have the same problem, and >> > essentially the same fix. >> >> Can someone work on getting this straightened out and resubmit the >> final patch so I can apply something? >> > > Apparently Daniel is busy. > > I guess we can use Eric B. patch, then ? That sounds good to me. After reviewing the other thread to the best of my knowledge there are no issues with the patch I submitted. At worst I am 4 bytes extra permissive about the mtu because of the way that path handles vlan headers and that isn't something my patch changed. Eric -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists