| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20110328.165311.226778266.davem@davemloft.net> Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 16:53:11 -0700 (PDT) From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> To: bhutchings@...arflare.com Cc: martinez.javier@...il.com, eric.dumazet@...il.com, error27@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2 v2] tg3: Don't use IRQF_SAMPLE_RANDOM From: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com> Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 18:20:22 +0100 > On Mon, 2011-03-28 at 17:46 +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: >> Yes this definitely is not janitor material :) >> >> I just sent the patch because I saw IRQF_SAMPLE_RANDOM in >> Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt. I can resend a patch >> removing the macro in the remaining network cards if the decision is >> to remove IRQF_SAMPLE_RANDOM. > > It's not my call, but I would support it. FWIW, I support it too. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists